Skip to content

Working towards understanding and healing between Native American and non-Native peoples

  • Home
  • About
  • Dakota Access Pipeline
  • Enbridge Line 3
  • Public Art
  • Reparations
  • Sacred Site Tours
  • Scaffold
HomePosts tagged 'public engagement'

public engagement

State agencies hold their Line 3 information close to the vest, who are they protecting?

September 23, 2021 healingmn Enbridge Line 3, treaty rights Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, public engagement

Minnesotans like to think we are a good government state, with sunshine laws and the ability to file State Data Practices Act requests to obtain public documents.

These laws are well and good, but they don’t replace state agencies’ responsibilities to proactively publish information they know to be of broad public interest.

The Enbridge Line 3 tar sands pipeline provides a number of examples where state agencies have failed at information sharing.

Continue reading →

Share this:

  • Email
  • Tweet
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
3 Comments

Enbridge Line 3 might be nearing completion, but state officials still have a lot to answer for

July 30, 2021 healingmn corporate capture, Enbridge Line 3, treaty rights Gov. Tim Walz, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, public engagement, public interest

Enbridge Line 3 construction might be nearly done, but efforts to stop it from operating are far from over. Lawsuits are still pending.

Yet as we continue the important work of Line 3 resistance, we also need to have a keen focus on the broken regulatory system that approved Line 3, and is backing harmful projects such as the PolyMet Mine.

Line 3 provides an important window into that broken regulatory system. The term now in vogue is “regulatory capture.”

Regulatory capture is an economic theory that says regulatory agencies may come to be dominated by the industries or interests they are charged with regulating. The result is that an agency, charged with acting in the public interest, instead acts in ways that benefit … the industry it is supposed to be regulating.

Investopedia

State officials have dodged tough questions and accountability for their flawed decisions and complicity in the harm Line 3 will bring. Local media has let us down with its thin coverage.

What follows is a set of 14 questions that our state leaders and regulators still need to answer. In broad terms, they are: How do you understand the “public interest?” How does citizen participation affect decisions or is it just for show? How are you holding polluters accountable?

We need to keep pressing for answers.

Continue reading →

Share this:

  • Email
  • Tweet
  • Print

Like this:

Like Loading...
1 Comment

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 517 other followers

Recent Posts

  • Minneapolis seeks public comments on police contract negotiations, appointment of city’s first Community Safety Commissioner
  • Pope’s Residential School apology draws mixed reaction around Turtle Island
  • News: Historic vote on blood quantum rule, Marlene Helgemo walks on, MPD Settlement Agreement expected by Fall
  • Two lakes, two streams, and a marsh take land developer to court, and other news
  • How much damage could Enbridge’s Line 5 pipeline wreak in Wisconsin? Take the tour!
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • healingmnstories.wordpress.com
    • Join 517 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • healingmnstories.wordpress.com
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: