But what does ‘as expeditiously as practical’ mean?
UPDATE: See Enbridge tells EPA it’s already started to decommission the old Line 3 pipeline
A major reason the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) voted to approve the new and larger Enbridge Line 3 tar sands pipeline is because commissioners were deathly afraid that original (and aging) Line 3 would rupture and spill somewhere along its northern Minnesota route.
Recall that then-PUC Commissioner Dan Lipschultz famously said that he felt like he had “a gun to the head,” meaning he either approved the new Line 3 or risked a major spill on the old Line 3.
Enbridge filed notice with the PUC Sept. 29 that Line 3 “is expected to be placed into service, with line fill activities reaching Minnesota, as early as October 3, 2021.”
That should put the gears in motion to shut down the old Line 3. That was the deal.
I’m guessing Enbridge would like to double dip as long as it can, running both pipelines and getting more profits. So who’s going to force Enbridge to stop running the old Line 3?
It’s the federal government’s responsibility, but exactly when that will happen isn’t clear.Continue reading